Zero Squared #89: Deplorables

NYU professor Michael Rectenwald is the guest this week. Rectenwald was recently at the center of a small controversy at NYU because, after being called out on Facebook for posting a link to an article mocking the need for alternative pronouns for all the various genders, he decided to create an alt-right persona and critique SJWs on twitter. When he announced the results of this “experiment” in an interview for the Washington Square News a slightly larger controversy erupted. His colleagues signed a collective letter criticizing his illogical rhetoric, finishing with the line “the cause of Professor Rectenwald’s guilt is certainly no, in our view, his identity as a cis, white, straight male. The cause of his guilt is the content and structure of his thinking.”
After this Rectenwald took a leave of absence from his University. With a little investigation it appears that he requested this leave of absence, but insinuated that the leave was not voluntary.

His story went somewhat viral. He was interviewed for various publications and penned an opinion piece for the Washington Post with the headline: “Here’s what happened when I challenged the PC campus culture at NYU.” He wrote, “I was strongly encouraged to take a paid leave of absence [and told] that it had nothing to do with my recent media posture. That’s not exactly how I see it.”
However, soon after this was published some of Rectenwald’s private emails were also published, namely a correspondence between NYU Dean Schwarzbach and Rectenwald. This correspondence made it clear that the leave of absence had been granted at Rectenwald’s request. The final email from Schwarzbach concludes.

“For us to be clear on your needs, we require you to state unequivocally and in a direct, unambiguous response whether you still need the leave you requested. I expect that answer—whichever you give—to be henceforth the same in all settings. If you cannot do that, at this point, I think I have no choice but to make a decision based on your public utterances, and the leave you requested—apparently under false pretenses—is withdrawn, and you are expected to meet your classes as assigned.”

I do not know if Rectenwald is now back at NYU and teaching or if his leave was extended, but I do know that all of this went on while the possibility of his promotion was being determined and that he eventually was promoted to the level of full professor.

From the outside, and with the facts that I have so far, it looks to me like Rectenwald pulled this stunt in order to create a context wherein his being passed over for promotion would have negative political consequences for the university. That isn’t a demonstrable fact, and if Rectenwald wants to return to the podcast in order to explain his side of the story more fully I’d be glad to talk to him again.

At the time this was recorded Trump had not been elected and I was very sympathetic to his cause.

I should take a moment to talk about that last fact. The fact that Donald Trump was elected is a game changer. The notion of safe spaces, for instance, has an entirely different connotation now that Stephen Bannon has been selected to be Trump’s chief of staff in the oval office. That said, the need for overcoming racial divides, for creating alliances and struggling together as a people regardless of race is the only way to amass enough political power to effectively fight back.

Rectenwald’s claim that identity politics on the left feeds and strengthens identity politics on the alt-right is worthy of consideration outside the context of Rectenwald’s shenanigans. Standing in solidarity with all the different people who Trump is scapegoating, making sure we protect and defend each other from attack, is necessary. Combating racism is an immediate priority even as we return to the task of changing the economic foundation that generates racism and divides us.

17 Nov 2016, 4:38pm
by Justin Wagner

reply

Hey Doug, just wanted to let you know that when I click on the link for this episode on the Zero Books main page it sends me to the membership page (“Join the Zero Books club”).

17 Nov 2016, 6:27pm
by Justin Wagner

reply

Working now.

17 Nov 2016, 9:12pm
by douglaslain

reply

Yeah. I fixed it. Thanks for letting me know.

what would it mean to test if lefty identity politics fuels rightwinger identity politics, how would we know/measure?

17 Nov 2016, 9:18pm
by douglaslain

reply

I suppose there are a couple of ways. One would be to do empirical studies like this:

http://acculturated.com/sexual-harassment-training/

But we can also try think through the logic of how certain tactics in the struggle for equality play out.

empirical studies would be better than speculation (in some ways the history of science is the history of debunking folk-psychology)but we don’t have the means to do empirical studies of such large and varying doings. I think in terms of organizing (say post Occupies) the question is really more one of priorities and hierarchy how do we decide what to do and how to do it, what group’s/person’s interests take priority/ etc
http://www.openculture.com/2016/11/philosopher-richard-rorty-chillingly-predicts-the-results-of-the-2016-election.html

https://vimeo.com/191794739
david harvey on circulation of capital

Thanks for your write-up. Another element is that just being a photographer entails not only problems in taking award-winning photographs but additionally hardships in acquiring the best dslr camera suited to your requirements and most especially challenges in maintaining the standard of your camera. This really is very true and evident for those photography enthusiasts that are into capturing the nature’s captivating scenes : the mountains, the particular forests, the actual wild or seas. Going to these daring places surely requires a camera that can meet the wild’s nasty surroundings.

I’ve noticed some new Marxist podcasts popping up recently, but none of them feature remixed Pokemon music

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *